# Apple M1, M1 pro M1 Max and Julia developpers

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/apple-m1-m1-pro-m1-max-and-julia-developpers/70627
**Category:** Offtopic
**Created:** [October 29, 2021, 3:30pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/apple-m1-m1-pro-m1-max-and-julia-developpers/70627 "2021-10-29T15:30:19Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![giordano](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/giordano/32/2166_2.png) [@giordano](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/giordano)
#### Post date: [October 30, 2021, 10:40am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/apple-m1-m1-pro-m1-max-and-julia-developpers/70627/15 "2021-10-30T10:40:42Z")

</div>

> [@Storopoli](#):
>
> What about LibTask?

It’s stalling

> <https://github.com/JuliaPackaging/Yggdrasil/pull/3597>
>
> Not Ready to merge yet, now only for reviewing and discussing.

But I’m still not convinced that having to build a binary library for that is a good idea 🤷‍♂️

> <https://github.com/TuringLang/Libtask.jl/issues/85>
>
> Maintaining a library like \`Libtask\_jll\` which links to libjulia isn't super sim…ple as you need to have libjulia\_jll available in the first place and then build against all different variations. Why don't you \`ccall\` directly into libjulia from Julia, instead of delegating the same work to an external library? This would have the advantage of having \`Libtask.jl\` more readily available on all platforms and versions of Julia without depending on external libraries.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/apple-m1-m1-pro-m1-max-and-julia-developpers/70627)._
