# Anyone still using julia-repl in Emacs with v0.5.\*?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/anyone-still-using-julia-repl-in-emacs-with-v0-5/4492
**Category:** General Usage
**Tags:** question
**Created:** [June 27, 2017, 1:48pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/anyone-still-using-julia-repl-in-emacs-with-v0-5/4492 "2017-06-27T13:48:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tamas\_Papp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tamas_papp/32/25949_2.png) [@Tamas\_Papp](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Tamas_Papp)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2017, 1:48pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/anyone-still-using-julia-repl-in-emacs-with-v0-5/4492/1 "2017-06-27T13:48:53Z")

</div>

_If you are not using Emacs, you can ignore this topic_.

[julia-repl](https://github.com/tpapp/julia-repl) contained a workaround for the `CHA` ANSI term sequence which [did not play well](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/20557) with `ansi-term` in Emacs. This was [fixed](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/commit/c9f28da19bfe061280fa91120c08ee851e1ff31e) in `v0.6.0`. I am in the process of getting julia-repl ready for MELPA, and would prefer to remove the workaround for technical reasons, unless there are some people here who use `julia-repl` **and** `v0.5.*`. So please let me know.

If you are only using `julia-mode` in Emacs, and/or `ESS`, this does not affect you.
