# Another possible solution to the global scope debacle

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/another-possible-solution-to-the-global-scope-debacle/15894>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Created:** [October 4, 2018, 6:14pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/another-possible-solution-to-the-global-scope-debacle/15894 "2018-10-04T18:14:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 107

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rui](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ba8739/32.png) [@Rui](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Rui)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 8:38pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/another-possible-solution-to-the-global-scope-debacle/15894/107 "2018-10-05T20:38:38Z")

</div>

Maybe one could use `local for`, `local let`, `local begin`. In any case, if the “only functions” thing is not strictly part of the proposal, then I see no problem.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/another-possible-solution-to-the-global-scope-debacle/15894)._