Yes, I’m open to LGPL/Qt/QML licencing discussed elsewhere, or maybe not much more to say. I just can’t split off the discussion.
I would still want this part, from the Qt website, not split off:
- The user of an application or device created with LGPL library has to be notified of their rights by providing a copy of the LGPL license text to the user and displaying a prominent notice about using the LGPL library – i.e. it is not allowed to hide the fact the LGPL library is used.
MIT hides that fact, that’s why I brought this up, responded to the licence change here. It’s the responsibility of @barche’s QML.jl, not so much his; maybe an ethical obligation to doc LGPL used by dependencies (and that fact), if MIT kept, or at least very helpful to his (possibly ignorant) users.