[ANN] PrettyTables v3.0.0

Ronis_BR · August 27, 2025, 1:42pm

Almost done!

juliohm · August 27, 2025, 1:44pm

@Ronis_BR I did hit another blocker today. CUDA.jl also needs an update after DataFrames.jl.

I am actually surprised that CUDA.jl depends on DataFrames.jl and PrettyTables.jl. There is definitely room for improvement there.

Opened an issue:

Ronis_BR · August 27, 2025, 1:46pm

The direct calls to PrettyTables.jl in CUDA.jl are here:

github.com/JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl

src/profile.jl

6ca192d1b


      
              formatters = function(v, i, j)
                  if v === missing
                      return "-"
                  elseif names(df)[j] in ["start", "time"]
                      format_time(v)
                  else
                      v
                  end
              end
              highlighters = time_highlighters(df)
              pretty_table(io, df; header, alignment, formatters, highlighters, crop,
                                   body_hlines=trace_divisions)
          else
              df = summarize_trace(df)
          
              columns = [:time_ratio, :time, :calls]
              if any(!ismissing, df.time_dist)
                  push!(columns, :time_dist)
              end
              push!(columns, :name)
              df = df[:, columns]

It should be really simple to update! However, I cannot test since I have no nvidia gpu

juliohm · August 27, 2025, 1:47pm

I believe their CI infrastructure covers it. We can submit a PR and wait for action.

Ronis_BR · August 27, 2025, 1:47pm

Awesome! Can you do this please while I am working in DataFrames.jl?

tchr · August 27, 2025, 1:49pm

I don’t need any .pdf documents (I don’t quite understand the LLM suggestion from @karei here); just an indication of what has changed. The “everything might have changed” is quite daunting honestly. Or, if that’s easier: what has stayed the same?

juliohm · August 27, 2025, 1:51pm

@Ronis_BR we can only run CUDA.jl tests after DataFrames.jl is released with support to PrettyTables.jl v3. I can try to prepare the PR to CUDA.jl after your DataFrames.jl PR is ready

Ronis_BR · August 27, 2025, 1:55pm

You probably can have all those answers here:

Ronis_BR · August 27, 2025, 4:44pm

@juliohm The PR to migrate DataFrames.jl is already submitted:

github.com/JuliaData/DataFrames.jl

PrettyTables.jl v3

main ← ronisbr:pretty_tables_v3

opened 04:41PM - 27 Aug 25 UTC

ronisbr

+592 -478

The PR updates the support in DataFrames.jl to PrettyTables.jl v3. I’ve also upd…ated the API call and the tests. As we can see from the tests, the output changes are minor. For the user, the printed version of DataFrames.jl should look exactly the same except in very edge cases. @bkamins I reviewed the list of open display-related issues, and I can address some of them. However, this migration is currently blocking some internal workflows because we can’t use DataFrames with PrettyTables v3 simultaneously. Could we please merge this support, and then I’ll handle the remaining issues?

Topic		Replies	Views
Current state and the future of PrettyTables.jl Package Announcements prettytables	140	7875	August 24, 2025
[ANN] PrettyTables.jl - Print formatted tables in Julia Package Announcements	84	17215	November 9, 2020
Help testing PrettyTables v0.10.0 Package Announcements	14	1763	December 1, 2020
PrettyTables.jl now has initial support for HTML output Community	14	5070	November 13, 2019
[ANN] PrettyTables 0.8.0 Package Announcements	13	1251	January 6, 2020

[ANN] PrettyTables v3.0.0

Related topics