# \[ANN\] JSON3.jl - Yet another JSON package for Julia

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-json3-jl-yet-another-json-package-for-julia/25625>\
**Category:** Package Announcements\
**Created:** [June 24, 2019, 8:31pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-json3-jl-yet-another-json-package-for-julia/25625 "2019-06-24T20:31:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![richiejp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/richiejp/32/19236_2.png) [@richiejp](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/richiejp)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2019, 10:45am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-json3-jl-yet-another-json-package-for-julia/25625/16 "2019-07-02T10:45:42Z")

</div>

Very interesting! I recently did a lot of work to [optimise BSON.jl](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/bsonqs-jl-v0-5-0-high-speed-fork-of-bson-jl/25918) and it sounds like there is quite a lot of overlap. However you seem to have gone further in some areas. It occurs to me that a lot of this could probably be generalised to both BSON, JSON and probably a lot of other formats as well. It is mostly the same patterns being repeated with quite a high cost in terms of development time.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-json3-jl-yet-another-json-package-for-julia/25625)._
