# \[ANN\] Bessels.jl - Bessel, Hankel, and Airy functions

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-bessels-jl-bessel-hankel-and-airy-functions/87941>\
**Category:** Package Announcements\
**Tags:** math, specialfunctions\
**Created:** [September 28, 2022, 4:41pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-bessels-jl-bessel-hankel-and-airy-functions/87941 "2022-09-28T16:41:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![heltonmc](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/heltonmc/32/43044_2.png) [@heltonmc](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/heltonmc)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2022, 5:12pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-bessels-jl-bessel-hankel-and-airy-functions/87941/3 "2022-09-28T17:12:52Z")

</div>

There is some ongoing discussion about this at this [issue](https://github.com/JuliaMath/SpecialFunctions.jl/issues/409) and it might be that `SpecialFunctions.jl` reexports these in the future once there is feature parity (support for complex numbers). There has been a lot of discussion about what to do with native julia functions (on [discourse](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/specialfunctions-jl-successor/35704/16) and scattered through [issues](https://github.com/JuliaMath/SpecialFunctions.jl/issues/213)) in `SpecialFunctions.jl` so I think that would have to happen with care. Happy to hear any thoughts on this!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-bessels-jl-bessel-hankel-and-airy-functions/87941)._