this may fit better in development than first steps, but before I bother the developers, let me ask the basics? would it introduce any ambiguity if Vector{AbstractFloat} was interpreted as Vector{<:AbstractFloat}. The former seems quite natural, and I have been bitten a few times by inadvertently …

Ambiguity on Vector{<:Abstract*}?

stevengj April 27, 2018, 11:06pm 4

1 Like

Topic		Replies	Views
Why [1, 2, 3] is not a Vector{Number}? New to Julia question , parametric-types	41	6960	December 9, 2022
Why isn't `Vector{<:Float64}` reduced to `Vector{Float64}`? General Usage type , parametric-types	16	431	July 28, 2024
How does AbstractFloat[1.0f0] work? New to Julia	5	895	January 14, 2021
`Vector{Float64} <: Vector{Any}` = false, why? General Usage	12	1443	April 27, 2022
Simple question about Julia types New to Julia type	11	768	June 10, 2023