# AlgebraOfGraphics documentation frustrations

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/algebraofgraphics-documentation-frustrations/133903>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Tags:** algebraofgraphics\
**Created:** [November 15, 2025, 7:13pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/algebraofgraphics-documentation-frustrations/133903 "2025-11-15T19:13:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 36

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eben60](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/eben60/32/13475_2.png) [@Eben60](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Eben60)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2025, 8:55pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/algebraofgraphics-documentation-frustrations/133903/36 "2025-11-25T20:55:46Z")

</div>

> [@aplavin](#):
>
> They are fine for a set of basic plots that perfectly align with the “happy path”, but for basically anything I found that I fight the “grammar” more than it helps me.

Now I see - “[double axes considered harmful](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/2-y-axes-in-algebra-of-graphics/68968)”. ☹ So apparently it **is** just for statisticians.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/algebraofgraphics-documentation-frustrations/133903)._