# AI-generated enhancements and examples for StaticCompiler.jl

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ai-generated-enhancements-and-examples-for-staticcompiler-jl/134054
**Category:** Tooling
**Tags:** staticcompiler
**Created:** [November 23, 2025, 9:02am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ai-generated-enhancements-and-examples-for-staticcompiler-jl/134054 "2025-11-23T09:02:33Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mason](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/mason/32/2423_2.png) [@Mason](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Mason)
#### Post date: [November 23, 2025, 6:27pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ai-generated-enhancements-and-examples-for-staticcompiler-jl/134054/27 "2025-11-23T18:27:10Z")

</div>

Well, I’m feeling pretty justified in not wanting to review the PR.

For now, I’ve closed it as slop, but please feel free to try again and submit discrete PRs that do discrete things like e.g. upgrade to 1.11 / 1.12, or add certain features / analyses.

That said, if you do go and submit new PRs, please actually review and understand the code you’re submitting first. If I wanted an LLM to generate 20,000 lines of unreviewed code with fake tests, I could do it myself.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ai-generated-enhancements-and-examples-for-staticcompiler-jl/134054)._
