# A pass-through option for IOCapture

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/a-pass-through-option-for-iocapture/108642>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** question, io\
**Created:** [January 10, 2024, 8:03pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/a-pass-through-option-for-iocapture/108642 "2024-01-10T20:03:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![goerz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/goerz/32/3269_2.png) [@goerz](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/goerz)\
**Post date:** [January 12, 2024, 2:49am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/a-pass-through-option-for-iocapture/108642/9 "2024-01-12T02:49:19Z")

</div>

There’s a PR ready for review now, if anyone has any further input: [Allow pass-through of output by goerz · Pull Request #20 · JuliaDocs/IOCapture.jl · GitHub](https://github.com/JuliaDocs/IOCapture.jl/pull/20)

Thanks everyone, and especially @Sukera for solving the issue with the race condition in [Race condition reading from Pipe](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/race-condition-reading-from-pipe/108707)!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/a-pass-through-option-for-iocapture/108642)._
