a == b == c is a very nice construct. a < b > c too. however julia allows a != b != c, but i would call it contraintuitive, because it is true if a == c. my thinking is that != should not allow this at all, for it lacks common sense meaning. but if it is allowed, i would suggest translate to a != b &…

A != b != c

johnmyleswhite January 9, 2017, 8:58pm 19

You’re now actively spreading misinformation. Please stop.

1 Like

Topic		Replies	Views
Speculation chained comparison optimization (possibly with outlining) Offtopic	10	2367	January 9, 2017
Behavior of == when isless or < is defined General Usage	22	2263	April 4, 2018
5 < x != y < 5 General Usage	18	1044	January 26, 2021
Why is there no isless(::Int64, ::UnitRange{Int64})? General Usage range , unitrange	45	1215	April 9, 2025
Meaning of `isless`, `<`, `cmp`, `isequal`, `==`, total order, partial order, unordered Internals & Design	24	2449	January 7, 2018