# 1.0 annoyances and Matlab comparison

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-annoyances-and-matlab-comparison/9433>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Created:** [March 1, 2018, 9:49pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-annoyances-and-matlab-comparison/9433 "2018-03-01T21:49:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 80

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nalimilan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/nalimilan/32/147_2.png) [@nalimilan](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/nalimilan)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2018, 12:10pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-annoyances-and-matlab-comparison/9433/80 "2018-03-04T12:10:08Z")

</div>

> [@Liso](#):
>
> And BTW could you explain what exactly do you like? What will be more simple or more clear?
> 
> Why not to keep default Array constructor to use uninitialized memory?

See [Array{T}(initialization,...) syntax - #2 by mbauman](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/array-t-initialization-syntax/9298/2).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-annoyances-and-matlab-comparison/9433)._