# 1.0 adoption path?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-adoption-path/7922>\
**Category:** General Usage\
**Created:** [December 22, 2017, 6:19pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-adoption-path/7922 "2017-12-22T18:19:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 45

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jlperla](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jlperla/32/34332_2.png) [@jlperla](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jlperla)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2018, 4:51am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-adoption-path/7922/45 "2018-01-04T04:51:20Z")

</div>

> [@BLI](#):
>
> I assume that the Control package of Julia has copied MATLAB’s LTI system

At this point, there seems to be a variety of LTI libraries directly and as components of other packages. See [Introducing a new Control Toolbox for Julia with Interactive root locus](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/introducing-a-new-control-toolbox-for-julia-with-interactive-root-locus/7486) for some discussions. My guess is that post v0.7 freeze it might make sense to collect everyone who uses those sorts of control libraries, and see if a standardized interface is possible.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/1-0-adoption-path/7922)._